(Canadian

Three quick comments:ZerMunde said:I also think the 2-line design was better than the new single line. The 2-line allowed the user to view the memo field while scrolling through transactions which was handy. It would be easy to offer a choice to the user – show registers in 1-line or 2-lines.
ZerMunde said:The initial post on this issue was written in Sept. 2016. The "Under Consideration" status was last updated March 2019. And the "Under Consideration" link leads to a "Page Not Found" error. After over 3 years with no action, it's plausible to assume Quicken will not return this feature to the app.
For these, Meanwhile, you can add your VOTE to Option to Stay in Edit Mode or to Hit Return/Enter To Open New Transaction and Add option for 2-line/row display.ZerMunde said:...
Another step backwards in Quicken 2019 for the Mac is the missing blank entry field at the bottom of registers. The older UX in 2007 was far better with a blank transaction field ready to be filled in. I also think the 2-line design was better than the new single line. The 2-line allowed the user to view the memo field while scrolling through transactions which was handy. It would be easy to offer a choice to the user – show registers in 1-line or 2-lines.
[email protected] said:Etoile, thanks for your work around. I'll give it a shot.
Call me picky, but I expect Quicken to give me a transaction by transaction picture of my financial positions, both past and present. How can that be done if precise reconciliations can't be accomplished? If previous reconciliation statements can't be resurrected, how about giving us the ability to "unreconcile" transactions? Preferably in batch ability? We can then re-reconcile and save the new reconciled statements.
MWKingSD said:Hey - I used this feature regularly in a year. There is no excuse for going backward on features - PUT IT BACK!