(Canadian

jacobs said:For what it's worth, standard Debt accounts can be reconciled. Loan accounts cannot be. (I don't know why.)
This is something I have never understood. It is even faster on Quicken Windows ( and old Mac I'm guessing) where there is the loan wizard that takes care of the split transaction on the checking account side (which is downloaded and reconciled). But the "loan account" was never reconciled or downloaded. Why people pushed to get it as download is beyond me. The very fact that you reconcile the transaction in the checking account proves that the loan account will be correct.jacobs said:It requires manually updating the split amounts between mortgage and interest each month from an amortization print-out, so it takes perhaps 30 seconds of manual intervention each month or. But for those who want to do it that way --
No, the reconciling the checking account assures that the amount paid out of checking is correct, but there could be discrepancies in the split of loan principal versus interest, and/or in the escrow split. So I do understand why someone might want to check and adjust their loan account -- I'm not sure why reconciling is needed, versus just checking the balance in Quicken versus the loan company's balance, and entering an adjustment if it's off a few cents. Typically, a monthly reconciliation would have only one transaction to reconcile.Chris_QPW said:
This is something I have never understood. It is even faster on Quicken Windows ( and old Mac I'm guessing) where there is the loan wizard that takes care of the split transaction on the checking account side (which is downloaded and reconciled). But the "loan account" was never reconciled or downloaded. Why people pushed to get it as download is beyond me. The very fact that you reconcile the transaction in the checking account proves that the loan account will be correct.
When I talk about "reconciling" I'm not talking about checking off some transactions in a "reconcile dialog/view". To me reconciling is the process of making sure your transactions line up with what the financial institution has. And in the case of a split for a loan that is two financial institutions, checking account and loan payment statement. If one verifies that the transaction is correct then they will automatically be reconciling the loan account given that it starts with the right amount and no other transactions are introduced.jacobs said:No, the reconciling the checking account assures that the amount paid out of checking is correct, but there could be discrepancies in the split of loan principal versus interest, and/or in the escrow split. So I do understand why someone might want to check and adjust their loan account -- I'm not sure why reconciling is needed, versus just checking the balance in Quicken versus the loan company's balance, and entering an adjustment if it's off a few cents. Typically, a monthly reconciliation would have only one transaction to reconcile.Chris_QPW said:
This is something I have never understood. It is even faster on Quicken Windows ( and old Mac I'm guessing) where there is the loan wizard that takes care of the split transaction on the checking account side (which is downloaded and reconciled). But the "loan account" was never reconciled or downloaded. Why people pushed to get it as download is beyond me. The very fact that you reconcile the transaction in the checking account proves that the loan account will be correct.
I have assumed most people writing about this mean exactly that they want a reconcile screen with free checkboxes like other accounts.Chris_QPW said:
When I talk about "reconciling" I'm not talking about checking off some transactions in a "reconcile dialog/view". To me reconciling is the process of making sure your transactions line up with what the financial institution has.
I think you meant to say "I have not put a ...".
In my case, when reconciling loan account transactions, though I could go and recalculate the exact interest and principal for EACH one, I have always opted to simply enter a balance adjustment that corrects both with ONE transactions for the entire year, because that is all I need for tax purposes and nothing else. I have never found it necessary for each transaction to have each split be accurate as long as the yearly amount is correct.
And therein I believe is a big reason why a reconciliation function is of very little benefit and suspect that there is little business drive to implement one for the same reason.
This is not to dissuade the OP from having this request. But since the conversation went down this path, I just wanted to share some perspective.