Confused about the relationship between bill reminders and linked bills

I have successfully used bill reminders for years to project cash flow. Recently I linked reminders to biller accounts --but find the benefit of reminders are limited to the current monthly cycle, or the info available from the biller's account.
Am I setting these links up improperly, or am I missing a concept here? I want the benefit of long-term cash flow projections that are available with bill reminders (the estimate, or set value setting), which are then replaced with the actual month bill amount downloaded from the biller's account.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Am I setting these links up improperly, or am I missing a concept here? I want the benefit of long-term cash flow projections that are available with bill reminders (the estimate, or set value setting), which are then replaced with the actual month bill amount downloaded from the biller's account.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Tagged:
0
Comments
Bill Reminders (I dislike that term-scheduled transactions aren't always bills) are what you have used in the past. The Linked Bills is what goes out and gets the recent amount for a particular transaction-when it works/is supported.
It's a nice concept, but I find them more trouble than worth and don't bother with them. I prefer to pay amounts from official statements from the biller.
I'm now using Linked Bills to receive amount due notices, then I manually "pay" the updated amount from reminders. I haven't experienced file corruption and find this manual entry no more difficult than before, although a little silly.
Quicken is missing an obvious step to make this a productive tool --no? That's why I assumed I was making a mistake in the set up. Has anyone directly discussed this with support?
Otherwise the only advantage is having the info altogether in Quicken, rather than remember to coordinate with email notices.
That's why I assumed I was missing something, but likely Quicken itself is the clueless party.