(Canadian

BTW, there have been one or two work-arounds that have been mentioned here but I do not have them handy. You may want to search the forum for the info to see if they suit your needs.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Meanwhile, you can add your VOTE to Add Ability to Include or Exclude Transfers on Budgets.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
I think it has to be a loan payment specific budget category since the principal/interest amounts will always change month to month.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
I searched...and didn't find the workaround(s).jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
@mdelesalle at present only the interest can show up on budgets by default, except using a work-around.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Found it:jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Not vey useful for loan payments when P & I will change monthly. Work around is a bit ridiculous but thanks for sharing. Hopefully this will be added in future releases both budgeting for transfers and loan payments which are different.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
BTW, the "second" workaround...NOT selecting the Mortgage account in the report...doesn't seem to make any difference for me.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Also, finally diving into Quicken Mac 2017 reports.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
The why is simply because Quicken has been rebuilding the Mac version from the ground up and having to re-implement features. This is a long process, though it is much longer than most have desired. Not completely hard to understand given the last year and half effort to separate from Intuit and some of the mismanagement of Quicken for Mac prior to that. Hopefully the have a better footing now.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
And BTW, the voting is to help guide the priorities of that ongoing development effort moving forward and is one of the ways to voice your preferences.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
OK...even with the "busy" schedule of rebuilding Quicken Mac from 2007, they've had plenty of time with Q2014, 2015, 2016 and now 2017. That four years worth of products with horrendous reports.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
So, smayer SuperUser...tell me. How do you account for your mortgage principal payment in a report in Quicken Mac 2017? You ARE a SuperUser.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Same goes out to all the other Quicken Mac users out there.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
First, I do not use the budget feature. Second, my solution is that I do not use QM2017. I am still using QM2007 for many of the reasons you are complaining about.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Great advice. Basically, don't use the software.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
I like to tell it like it is and try to give a complete picture. At least you know the options. The rest is up to you.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
From the Quicken Mac 2017 website (quicken.com):jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Dental Pain, I feel your pain, but as smayer97 has said, this is mostly a user-to-user forum. (If you want, count that as another failing of Quicken, as I think they should have some associated with the the product team skimming these messages, and they generally don't.) So being snarky here doesn't have your desired affect of reaching Quicken. Instead, consider using the in-app problem reporting tool under the Help menu. The more customers they hear from, the more ways they hear what's causing users pain, the more likely it is to get addressed sooner.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
@jacobs...you...or ANY other Quicken Mac 2017 user...hasn't answered my last question.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Asked and answered...you cannot the way Quicken works today. You have to use a work-around.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Dental Pain, you keep asking for a solution and I and others have told you there really isn't one until Quicken is changed to allow user to selectively include certain account transfers as expenses.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Though I agree overall, they have QM2007 and QWin to know how to do this since those products do it right. There is no need to figure it out and re-invent the wheel or the need to apply a band-aid solution.jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).
Easy solution (workaround) until they get it fixed:jacobs said:Yes, you have run into one of the key stumbling blocks with budgeting as it currently exists. It does not allow you to budget for transfers of funds. Paying off your loan principal is a transfer from your checking account (asset) to your loan account (liability.) Similarly, you can't budget for a transfer from checking to savings or a retirement account, since those are transfers of assets and not expenses. It's a major shortcoming. The only good thing is that the product manager has acknowledge this and said it will be revamped in the future -- but we have no idea when (and he hinted at later rather than sooner).