Quicken Deluxe 2001

David Moore
David Moore Member ✭✭
Does Quicken Deluxe 2001 require a subscription as the newer versions do (to get rid of out-of-date messages)? Also will it run on Windows 10 and/or11?

Comments

  • volvogirl
    volvogirl SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
    2001?  Do you have 2001?  No it is not a subscription.  

    You can try to install an older version.  If you get it installed you will need to update it.  One of the SuperUsers has posted the update patches for older versions (2000 and newer) of Quicken

    http://www.quicknperlwiz.com/quicken-patches-us.html


    You should at least try to convert to the 2013 version since you don’t use any online services or download transactions now.  Then it should run on newer versions of Windows.  Starting in 2014 they instituted an ID password to get into your own data. I’m staying on 2013.


    2013 should run on Newer Windows.  You can download 2013 Deluxe for free using this how to convert article.  It’s under Converting from Quicken 2004-2009.

    https://www.quicken.com/support/how-and-when-use-intermediate-version-convert-older-versions-quicken 


    If your version is 2003 or earlier you will need to first convert to 2004.  Then convert to 2013.  Read that whole article on converting.


    And FYI - If your Quicken was before 2010 you should have several files making up the data.  The main data file ends in .QDF.  All Quicken versions prior to QW2010 store your data in a series of files all sharing the same filename but with different extensions like  - .QDF .IDX, .QEL, .QPH  and all 4 of those files were rolled into a single-file .QDF starting in 2010. 


    I'm staying on Quicken 2013 Premier for Windows.

  • thecreator
    thecreator SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you want to run Quicken 2001 Deluxe, you need to install the program on Windows XP or earlier. Quicken 2001 is too old to run on Windows 10 or 11.

    thecreator - User of Quicken Subscription R53.16 USA

    Windows 10 Pro 32-Bit Build 19045.3693
    Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit Build 19045.3754



This discussion has been closed.