Quote:" FAQ: Convert Share Class for Mutual Fund: I just found this thread. I also need to convert share classes in..." However, wouldn't these transactions muddle up the Investment Performance reports for the years involved? i.e. those lots that resulted from Dividends or CG reinvestments would now appear to be just additional purchases, thus not counted as investment income. Is there a solution for that? As originally noted, some performance metrics can be affected. The impact that I see along the line you are inquiring is that the amount invested for the original shares will be different than the amount invested for the converted shares since the original shares had reinvestments and the converted shares are created through ALL 'add shares' transactions. That difference in amount invested will lead to differences in ROI and perhaps other parameters. I do not know of a clean direct alternative approach. Properly constructed, a report on Average Annual Return should be consistent and correct. You need to choose what is meaningful to you and relevant to your data. I do not see where this approach muddles up data 'for the years involved'. The conversion - Remove and Add shares - takes place in current time at one day in time, not back when the original transactions were entered. Again careful construction of reports across the conversion time is necessary to get meaningful results. Reports for times before the conversion or after the conversion should not be affected.Is Intuit ever to add a Convert Share Class transaction? Why do you ask other users what the corporate plans are? Nobody posting here has any information relevant to your question. Intuit does not share their future development plans. I have seen Intuit employees post here that one of their development considerations is existence of a viable workaround. It would not surprise me if Intuit rationalized that this approach represents a viable workaround for share class conversions, thus they would choose not to expend resources to develop a separate tool. Note that any specific tool so developed has to address all the subtleties or carry all the flaws of the current workaround. The more subtleties that are deemed necessary to address, the greater the development cost.