Thanks for the fast response.My concern with the large backup results from travelling. I've had to restore from backup a couple of times on the road and it can become expensive. Have you had problems getting "Unidentified Security" on the down loads. I manage multiple accounts and on one computer I get the correct security/option and on the other all downloads are "Unidentified Security". (Same options, same brokerage) It's like there's an init file on the one computer has been corrupted.
Hi Richard. I trade a lot of options and have made some options-related suggestions to Quicken before. A couple comments/questions based on your suggestions.1. When you're talking multiple securities in 1 transaction are you talking about opening or closing trades (e.g. opening an iron condor - 4 legs) in one transaction or are you talking about the open and closing trade (e.g. BTO and STC) in one transaction. Even if this was implemented I guess I don't see what the time savings would be over entering multiple transactions via the register because even if there were a way to enter multiple legs at one time you would still have to enter all data for each leg (action, date (which could default to the same date) security/symbol, price, quantity, commission, etc) as for tax purposes each leg is a separate taxable transaction even if though some brokerages will "show" multi-leg transactions as 1 transaction in their trading platform.2. I think this is kind of already present. Just click the Add Security Manually link (at the bottom of the window - the name may not be exactly this as I'm doing this from memory) and it won't go through the lookup. I always set up options manually.3. I've made the same suggestion using expiration date as the trigger to ask the user if they want to hide options past expiration date. I don't think it makes sense to automatically hide them without querying the user because sometimes transactions aren't entered until the day after they expire and if they're automatically hidden the transaction entry is more cumbersome.4. Challenge here is "typically" as some contracts are not 100 shares so Quicken would need to track the contract specs for all securities or provide some kind of default/override to implement this so I'm not sure it would be a huge benefit.
I too regularly trade options. For me the most annoying thing is dealing with the menu box that makes me choose which option I mean when buying to close a call or selling to close a put, etc. I haven't given it a lot of thought - yet - but I think Quicken could do better.
A buy-sell screen like I suggested would address that issue. That and being able to completely skip the security lookup-related screens.
Interesting feedback. Another issue for Quicken then becomes using a standard way of specifying option symbols so that they can be interpreted and linked to the associated stocks.The standard symbology for options is <symbol><date><put/call><strike> (e.g., "AAPL180316C180") so perhaps Quicken could be enhanced to accept and interpret that format.