Decimal points in investment reports?
Microfiche
Quicken Canada Subscription Member ✭✭✭
The number of shares stored in Quicken is correct and saved to the appropriate number (4) of decimal places for my mutual funds, however when I run a report out of Quicken, it only exports 3 decimal places. Is there a way that I can increase the precision of the reports? Takes lot of time to fix the exports.
Using Quicken since sometime before the beta test of Quicken 6 for Windows in 1996...
0
Best Answer
-
Check your preferences settings for Reports. There is an option there on number of digits after the decimal to use in reports.3
Answers
-
Check your preferences settings for Reports. There is an option there on number of digits after the decimal to use in reports.3
-
Thanks - was that always there? I am sure I have had this problem for years and assumed it would never be fixed so I stopped looking in the preferences...Using Quicken since sometime before the beta test of Quicken 6 for Windows in 1996...0
-
Microfiche said:was that always there?
Quicken user since version 2 for DOS, now using QWin Biz & Personal Subscription (US) on Win10 Pro.
0 -
I know what it was now - as I got further into my tax calculations.
It was the EXCHANGE RATE decimal places that I can't change - it only shows 2 decimal places which is insufficient - I have at least 4 decimal places entered.Using Quicken since sometime before the beta test of Quicken 6 for Windows in 1996...0 -
What "exchange rate"? Currency? MF trade?0
-
Yes - currency exchange rate, specifically USDCAD. If I dump out a report of my USD account transactions the exchange rate only comes out with 2 decimal places. I need the full 4+ decimals in order to do some of the calculations that I do. Can't seem to figure a way to get more precision.
When I noticed the mutuals were only 3 decimal places, it reminded me of a precision error I have had for a long time - but it was currency exchange rate, not the shares.Using Quicken since sometime before the beta test of Quicken 6 for Windows in 1996...0
This discussion has been closed.