Recent Bank Download Issues

lks2022
lks2022 Quicken Windows Other Member ✭✭

For the past month or so my bank downloads have downloaded transactions that were previously downloaded and reviewed. Sometimes I delete a downloaded transaction because I've already recorded that transaction. The deleted transactions keep getting downloaded again and again every time I do an update. Now I find that one of bank accounts is really out of whack.

This all started after I got a notice that Quicken was having issues with bank downloads.

How do I fix this issue. It's quite annoying.

Answers

  • NotACPA
    NotACPA Quicken Windows Subscription SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    What bank? What download method into Q? Has the download method recently changed?

    Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
    Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
    Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP

  • lks2022
    lks2022 Quicken Windows Other Member ✭✭

    Two different local banks. Not sure what you mean by download method. And no, I have not changed anything.

  • NotACPA
    NotACPA Quicken Windows Subscription SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    Can't help if you won't name the banks. And "download method" is Direct Connect, Express Web Connect, Express Web Connect + or Web Connect.

    What method each bank uses can be observed at TOOLS, Account List.

    Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
    Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
    Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP

  • lks2022
    lks2022 Quicken Windows Other Member ✭✭

    Express web connect.

  • NotACPA
    NotACPA Quicken Windows Subscription SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    We can't help until we can determine if the problem is with the bank, or your file.

    Since you won't name the bank(s), we can't help.

    Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
    Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
    Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP

This discussion has been closed.