nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Growth of $10,000 Graph

MattT

Just a curiosity... why isn't all the beginning data (the beginning of the display time period), normalized to exactly $10,000?

I am displayed 3 indices plus "My Accounts". The beginning data for all plots start initially at values ranging from $9,669 to $10,026. Admittedly, not hypercritical, but starting off, there's already up to a 3.7% offset.

TIA for reading/responding.

Find more posts tagged with

Accepted answers

Jim_Harman

The legend on the graph for Last 12 months says 1/21 but if you view it today (1/10) the graph data starts at 1/10/21, so the first data point is comparing today's value to the 12/31/21 close.

All comments

Jim_Harman

The legend on the graph for Last 12 months says 1/21 but if you view it today (1/10) the graph data starts at 1/10/21, so the first data point is comparing today's value to the 12/31/21 close.

MattT

Actually mine shows the initial date is 1/31/2021 close ("Last 12 months" view and first data point on x-axis is 1/21 as you pointed out). However, your point is noted and that would explain the slight delta. Of course, this graph is a tool and not a metric.

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/6031128/uploads/editor/m3/v6xrzyegp0ow.jpg

Thanks Jim! Have a good one!
Matt

Jim_Harman

Quicken made some improvements to the Growth of $10,000 graph a couple of years ago, but before you pay too much attention to it, please review this discussion.
https://community.quicken.com/discussion/comment/20091670

MattT

Absolutely! A lot of, even good, financial institutions are often thrown off and challenged to accurately calculate investment performance (vs. 10k or any amount, including "real" beginning $$) when frequent or large deposits or withdrawals are made within the period of analysis.

Thanks Jim!