Alight 401Ks and 2026 "catchup" contribution changes

notintuitlobbyist
notintuitlobbyist Quicken Mac Subscription Member

I can't really figure out what to do with this one.
I have a 401K at Alight through my employer. This year, there was a change to force 401K "50+ catch up" contributions to a Roth account instead of traditional 401K.
I've now gotten my first paycheck of the year. The Quicken download automation shows contributions to my traditional 401K, no change. I checked the online account console, expecting that my HR hasn't made the change yet or something, but that's not the case. It shows contributions going to the same account, and there's notation that the catch up transaction is "Tax free Roth".
So it looks like this is being handled on their end as a mixed bucket, or in the alternative I guess you could think of it as sort of a sub-account. In either case the only thing I can think of to use to distinguish them is to manually tag the "Roth" one, and that still means I have one account containing two sets of funds subject to different taxation, and I don't think either Quicken or my brain is really set up for that situation.

Anyone else seen this? If so, any clever ideas? Or even bad ones?

Answers

  • John_in_NC
    John_in_NC Quicken Mac Subscription SuperUser, Mac Beta Beta

    Interesting question as this will likely come up more as Roth 401ks are increasing in popularity. I know my employer started offering that option a few years back.

    How does Alight represent this on their website? Are the funds commingled in the same account? (I suspect not-I would suspect them to break them into two accounts.) I can't see how a combination would be possible, especially if you contributed $ to the same funds with both pre/post tax handling. Figuring out what amount require RMDs (and taxation) would be a challenge.

    Also, while your employer is now tagging certain catch up contributions as being towards your Roth 401k, do the "buys" shown in your 401k at Alight show the total, or just the traditional IRA amounts?

    Let us know what you see on Alight's website versus what Quicken is downloading. And this might be something where your employer has updated the contributions, but the changes haven't occurred with Alight.

  • hurwi
    hurwi Quicken Mac Other Mac Beta Beta

    I use Fidelity and according to them, the pretax and Roth contributions and funds are comingled in the same account and tagged as pre-tax and Roth. Different companies handle this differently and in my case, since I haven't maxed out my pre-tax in the new year yet, I'm not seeing Roth contributions being made yet but will toward the end of the year when I start catch-up contributions. Would be great to be able to track these in Quicken in the same account.

  • notintuitlobbyist
    notintuitlobbyist Quicken Mac Subscription Member

    John_in_Nc,

    It really appears to be a mixed bucket. On the Alight webite, I have the same old account, no new ones, and see transactions for that pay period on the Alight website - my normal contribution, my employer's partial match, and the catchup amount, that last with with that "Roth tax free" notation.

    It occurred to me that I could transfer Roth transactions to a separate account for tracking, which would help, but that feels uncomfortably close to inventing my own fictional view of what's going on, not to mention being manual and error-prone.

  • jacobs
    jacobs Quicken Mac Subscription SuperUser, Mac Beta Beta

    I just don't see any way Quicken can track this without a pretty significant change in the program. As I noted in a different thread about this issue, you (or Quicken, eventually) could use Tags to identify contributions to the account which are Roth — but there would be no way to separate and track dividends and capital gain payments between Roth and non-Roth components of the account unless the financial institution splits those transactions.

    Quicken's architecture is built around its accounts matching real-world accounts which are of a single type; there is no provision for a single account to be partly traditional and partly Roth. The OFX and FDX standards used for downloading transactions are focused on the account rather than the tax implications of individual transactions within the account. That means every financial institution is likely to have its own way of identifying Roth contributions, and without a standard, Quicken would need to custom-program each financial institution's labeling of such transactions.

    This is an issue which seemingly affects all of Quicken's products (Quicken Mac as well as Quicken Windows and Quicken Simplifi), so it would be interesting to know if senior management is aware of this issue and if they have devised a way they aim to change the programs to track this in the future — but there's no way to ask or get an answer about that.

    Quicken Mac Subscription • Quicken user since 1993
  • John_in_NC
    John_in_NC Quicken Mac Subscription SuperUser, Mac Beta Beta

    Thanks @notintuitlobbyist and @hurwi

    The fact that the transx are commingled is worrisome to me. If they are indeed separate buys for the traditional/Roth amounts, then I would be less concerned. I that case, I would do the same as Jacob suggested and Tag the Roth contributions (or both types) so you can isolate them if needed. That is about the most you can do. I do not suggest keeping the transactions in a separate account because I, like Jacob, prefer that my Quicken file mirrors how things occur in the real world. Reinventing the wheel usually causes problems down the line.

    I expect to see more questions regarding this.

  • Jon
    Jon Quicken Mac Subscription SuperUser, Mac Beta Beta

    Back when I had a 401K I didn't have any Roth contributions but I did always go slightly over the limit at the end of the year & end up with a little bit of after-tax money going in to it in December. The transaction history broke out the different portions of the contributions so I could see how much pre-tax and after-tax money was going into each fund every paycheck, but the quarterly and annual statements didn't go into as much detail. There was a table showing how much of each type of money was invested (but not where) and a second table showing which funds I was invested in (with all types of money lumped together), so it would have been difficult to reconcile to a Quicken account broken down by both asset type and by money type, so I didn't bother trying to track tax-deferred vs after-tax in Quicken. Once I retired & rolled everything into IRAs the different monies got broken out into different IRA accounts, so it's pretty easy to deal with now.