Problems with Version R30.09

mlgilbert7

Community Cover-up?

Where did my question about problems encountered with the new version R30.9 go to? The share pricing problem still exists, and the change in views and updating information could help others save the 3 hours I spent fixing my transactions.

mlgilbert7

Not deleted, somebody moved it into another thread.

splasher

Not somebody, a moderator merged it because it was not a new topic and should have been added to an existing topic so that everything on that topic is in on thread and not strewn around in a bunch of small pieces all over the place.

Based on your actions so far, you will probably reject this response too, but that is the way forums should work.

mlgilbert7

Once I figured out that it had been merged I did acknowledge it and marked it as answered.

Having the discussion/question disappear with no notice does not seem like a good practice. One would expect a message and a link or at least a link in the original. I knew about the $1 pricing problem and how to switch views from other posts. I was bringing up 2 new problems - no backup and unexpected transaction behavior. Turns out it is not a view - it's a completely different behavior in the tracking method.

On the development teams I've worked on we would prefer separate reports to make sure each problem gets fixed, not to just lump it in a release problem.

mlgilbert7

I'm not going to even bother posting if somebody decides to delete it because it makes Quicken look bad.

Ps56k2

if you click on your Profile it will show what Discussions you have started,
and which ones you have commented....

https://community.quicken.com/profile/mlgilbert7

mlgilbert7

And the discussion I started today does not show up. Somebody deleted it.

mlgilbert7

Not deleted, somebody moved it into another thread.

splasher

Not somebody, a moderator merged it because it was not a new topic and should have been added to an existing topic so that everything on that topic is in on thread and not strewn around in a bunch of small pieces all over the place.

Based on your actions so far, you will probably reject this response too, but that is the way forums should work.

mlgilbert7

Once I figured out that it had been merged I did acknowledge it and marked it as answered.

Having the discussion/question disappear with no notice does not seem like a good practice. One would expect a message and a link or at least a link in the original. I knew about the $1 pricing problem and how to switch views from other posts. I was bringing up 2 new problems - no backup and unexpected transaction behavior. Turns out it is not a view - it's a completely different behavior in the tracking method.

On the development teams I've worked on we would prefer separate reports to make sure each problem gets fixed, not to just lump it in a release problem.