Payee auto-renaming - old vs. new behavior

meeotch
meeotch Quicken Windows Subscription Member ✭✭

TL/DR: what's changed with Quicken's suggested payee naming in the past year, and is there any way of getting back the old behavior?

I've got a file with data going back a decade+, and Quicken would usually suggest a human-readable payee for downloaded transactions, no renaming rules necessary. Maybe there'd be a partial phone number or location code stuck in there, but mostly it made sense.

Over the past year, there seem to have been multiple changes in the renaming scheme: for a while, they were ALL CAPS, then there was a bug where some came up as just a single digit ("2"), etc.

The problem is that virtually none of them now match the many hundreds of payees that have existed in my file forever. I had almost no renaming rules before, and now I'm finding myself (auto)creating rules for practically every downloaded transaction.

The old scheme was never perfect - but it was at least somewhat consistent. (In fact, I only learned about "Revert to Original Payee" once things started to go haywire this year.) And disabling "Automatically Apply Suggested Name" doesn't help - you're still stuck creating a zillion renaming rules.

Answers

  • Chris_QPW
    Chris_QPW Quicken Windows Subscription Member ✭✭✭✭

    For Quicken to "make suggestion" on a payee name a few things have to be true. First off you can't have a renaming rule that applies. And that implies something, you have to have turned off this option:

    image.png

    Because with it on, Quicken is going to be creating new renaming rules (which may or may not have the result you want).

    Next if there isn't a renaming rule that matches Quicken will "make a guess" if this option is on.

    image.png

    But with that being said, this isn't what I would recommend for anyone other than someone just beginning with Quicken.

    First off, this "suggested name" is a guess, it is based on some data they have "on the server" of what payee names are what. Being a guess, it can certainly be wrong. What's more, being a "look up" means that it doesn't work for all payees. So, many a times, this will "fail" and do nothing to the payee's name. This of course will then be magnified by going into trying to match a memorized payee, and if you have Quicken automatically creating them, you will get a ton of them in a short order.

    So, my recommendation for long time users is to properly setup your renaming rules and memorized payees (and lock them) and avoid all the "guessing".

This discussion has been closed.