Sell all leaves me with negative cost basis
I sold all of this mutual fund in my 401K, and I end up with a negative cost basis that breaks reports. I have no placeholder entries in the account. I've tried deleting and redoing the final sell transaction and using sell all as well as <ctrl-Z>, but nothing has worked.
Answers
-
Do you have any Return of Capital transactions for these securities?
Have you tried Validating your Q data file?
Which specific Q product are you running and what BUILD of that product? This info is at HELP, About Quicken.
Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP0 -
R64.30 Build 27.1.64.30. Validating didn't help.
I don't have any Return of Capital, but I do have two small Removed transactions for when Fidelity charged me a fee. Also, the lots were created from Added transactions in 2022 when my employer switched brokerages.
0 -
Tell us more about those Removed txn. Did you already have cash in the account, or did you sell an impacted security? What action did you use to record the expense in Q?
Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP0 -
I'm assuming there was no cash in the account, so Fidelity sold shares and took the money. The downloaded transactions were "Removed" for 0.154 and 0.146 shares. These appear to have no lot selected which is likely the problem.
0 -
Deleting the Removed transactions didn't help. Now I have 0.3 shares held, cost basis=-16.06.
0 -
Should have chg'd those REMOVED to SOLD, of whatever security was actually sold to generate the cash.
A SELL txn will also reduce the cost basis of the overall holding by the basis of the shares sold.
Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP0 -
Sure, I should have changed them to sold plus xout if I really cared about being accurate to the 0.3 of a share on a security that I no longer own. But since I don't, I just deleted them to try to solve the problem. Either way, Quicken shouldn't have a cost basis for a security with 0 shares. This is obviously a Quicken bug. I'm just hoping to find a workaround.
0 -
So I am OCD enough that I would want to resolve the -19.19 cost basis as well. I suspect there has been some improper mix-up on a sale transaction along the way. That assumes there were prior sales before that final sale. I am also assuming there was not strange event along the way with this fund - a takeover or conversion, or other non-standard historical event.
First, I would restore the two 'Remove Shares' either as those or as Sold Shares with whatever other disposition of the sale proceeds ($3.13 ?).
Second since this is a 401k and capital gains do not matter, I would then edit each of the prior sales and specify the lots sold each time as the 'First lots In' selection. I'd work from oldest to newest. Hopefully that will clear the issue.
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 56 Product Ideas
- 36 Announcements
- 225 Alerts, Online Banking & Known Product Issues
- 22 Product Alerts
- 703 Welcome to the Community!
- 671 Before you Buy
- 1.2K Product Ideas
- 53.7K Quicken Classic for Windows
- 16.3K Quicken Classic for Mac
- 1K Quicken Mobile
- 812 Quicken on the Web
- 111 Quicken LifeHub

