File Validation suggests Stock Split - but they are there

Ps56k2 SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 2018 in Investing (Windows)
When I run File Validation - Q2018 R9.34 - everything looks good, except for the warnings on a couple of stock splits that may be missing - the problem is - they are listed in the stock register.

[Tue Jul 24 12:11:34 2018]
File: "C:\Users\Owner\Documents\Quicken_Files\QDATA22z8"
Validating your data.
No errors.
No read errors.
All internal consistency checks passed.
[Tue Jul 24 12:13:17 2018]
Additional data conversion in QWMain started
[Tue Jul 24 12:13:25 2018]
Quicken has found 1 stock split(s) for account "Schwab-JT", security "AT&T", 
on 12/20/1993 that might be missing. 
Quicken has found 1 stock split(s) for account "Schwab-JT", security "AT&T", 
on 2/27/1989 that might be missing.
Validation has completed.


QWin - R54.16 - Win10


  • Sherlock
    Sherlock Member ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2018
    Did AT&T really post splits on 2/27/1989 and 12/20/1993?

    If you haven't already, I suggest deleting these specific splits and then reentering them.
  • Jim_Harman
    Jim_Harman SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2018
    Looks like no splits on those dates. See
    But AT&T did a lot of merging and splitting over the years and sometimes there is a delay between when a split is announced and when it takes place.
    QWin Premier subscription
  • Ps56k2
    Ps56k2 SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2018
    tnx for the reply -
    I had the old orig ATT, then the ATT/celluar (AWE), then the re-merged RBOCS back from Illinois Bell into ATT (again) - so I may have done some fancy things along the way....Sold "T" back in 2017 - so not an issue now - but will take a look and play with it .

    QWin - R54.16 - Win10

  • q_lurker
    q_lurker SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2018
    Those could have been splits for the original 'T' or for what was at the time 'SBC' before it acquired the orbital T and renamed itself.

    If you data appears correct (balances), I would disregard the validation warnings.
This discussion has been closed.