Investment Income - Summary of DIV by Security
Ps56k2
Quicken Windows Subscription Alumni ✭✭✭✭
I have a report - Investment Income -
and have it showing only DIVX transactions against my Schwab account -
sorted by Security -
and have it showing only DIVX transactions against my Schwab account -
sorted by Security -
Is there any way to generate a report like this -
but just sub-total the amount, without the "detail" lines ?
I just want to see the total DIV income generated by each stock
but just sub-total the amount, without the "detail" lines ?
I just want to see the total DIV income generated by each stock
0
Comments
-
If you haven't already, you may want to consider a customized Investment Income report with Subtotal by: Security0
-
that's what is above - but still has the detail lines....
NBD - 4 print pages vs just 1
0 -
Here is the full screen - can't really collapse the detail lines - but NBD - 4 pages vs 1 -0
-
ps56k said:Here is the full screen - can't really collapse the detail lines - but NBD - 4 pages vs 1 -0
-
At the other views - it becomes a "horizontal sliding" report - with a page per security, which makes sense if you have multiple "attributes" you are tracking.
I saved the report for future reference, but can't really print it...
but again - have my other printed report.Thanks for the pointers...0 -
ps56k said:At the other views - it becomes a "horizontal sliding" report - with a page per security, which makes sense if you have multiple "attributes" you are tracking.
I saved the report for future reference, but can't really print it...
but again - have my other printed report.Thanks for the pointers...0 -
too much work - doing TTax - just wanted to see where all the Divs were coming from
0 -
You can produce a report with the total income per security by adding the Income column to an Investing > Portfolio view and setting the As of date and the Options > Portfolio preferences starting date as needed.
This will not distinguish between interest and dividends however.QWin Premier subscription0
This discussion has been closed.