walter bender said: Two of the four contributions report correctly in the Tax Summary Report but two do not. I have deleted the transactions and reentered them to no avail.
UKR said:My question is: Why do you need to use an account at all, to track money given away to charity?
Frankx said: ... But the contribution actually has to be reported on IRS Form 8283 if the value of the securities is $500.00 or more and this is also not a "Cash Charitable Contribution".Frankx
dshovel said: I am using "Shares Transferred Between Accounts" transaction since selling the shares in my taxable account will create a capital gain (it doesn't make sense to gift shares at a loss.) I am then creating a cash transfer from my taxable account to the DAF equal to the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the gifted shares that is logged as a "Non-Cash Charity Contribution" by way of the "Transfers In" Tax Schedule feature. I then create an equivalent reverse transaction back to my taxable account so that the cash balances remain correct. The net result is that I get the FMV of the security gifted to the DAF in my Schedule A report categorized as "Non-Cash Charity Contributions" exactly like I want. I wonder if there is a better way. Happy to learn if any others have solved this in a better way.
You had cited a Remove Shares transaction. That transaction does not offer the "Transfer to:" option and would thus also require manual entry of Add Shares transactions into the DAF account. I don't think that is what you intended.
More to follow in a separate commentary.
@Frankx Step 3 -- In my experience with gifted securities, it is my Financial Institution that defines the value of the gift. It does not matter what the receiving agency does with the shares, or when they sell them. Typically, my FI values the gift and reports the value to me for my Form 8283 using the average of that day's high and low trading values (in disagreement with your closing paragraph comment). That becomes the valuation I want Quicken reporting to me for my tax planning. Closing this thought, I suspect it is the taxpayer's responsibility to declare the value of the gift and perhaps the IRS would not care about the source of the information provided the valuation was reasonably determined.
I created a 'test' situation to try to find compatibility and differences. For my test, I bought 10 shares MSFT on 5/31/19 at $124/share and then gifted them on 12/15/20. I then speculated the DAF sold them on 12/22/20 for $224/share. Relevant prices for MSFT are:
I did this two different way working with Brokerage F (Frankx's approach) and Brokerage Q (my preferred approach). For each, I bought MSFT, transferred the shares to the (separate) DAF account, and sold the shares in the DAF account. For my approach, I supplement those with Add Shares, Sell Shares, and MiscInc transactions The resulting transactions in all three account are (Investment Transactions Report):
Note that my added transactions (Add Shares and Sell Shares) are using a price for basis and sale of 213.83/share ($2138.30 total) = the average of the hi and lo prices on the date of the transfer. That is the computation my FI would report to me for my Form 8283 filing. That is also the value used for the MiscInc expenditure that is categorized as a non-cash charitable contribution.
What do my three added transactions get me:
Primarily, the entry in the Schedule A report. My method develops that line item, Frankx's does not.
The effect on the Investment Performance is arguable. On the surface, there is a small difference as shown - 37.58 vs 37.37%. But the reality lies in the 2141.30 value used for the Remove Shares and (for may approach) the Add Shares. Quicken calculates that value in both cases as shares x closing price for the date (214.13/share). I would argue the proper value to use is the 213.83/share = 2138.30 total) since that is what was gifted per reports from my FI. If the closing price for 12/15/20 is edited to 213.83, then the Avg Annual Return number on both brokerage accounts goes to the 37.37% value - agreeing with each other. The downside of that price edit is that net worth on that specific date can be misstated (if other shares of MSFT are still owned.)
Summary: I am still satisfied that my approach gives me what I want. The method suggested by Frankx is very close and certainly simpler but may not present very clearly the gifted value. That is what I am after. As @Rocket J Squirrel observed, I am using fake transactions to get what I want. I know of no other way.
I hope this presents useful information for interested readers. BTW, the only aspect the DAF consideration adds is whether a 'separate' DAF account is established and maintained within Quicken.