How would I account for the medicare premium deduction from my Soc. Sec. check?
MrJeff
Quicken Windows Subscription Member
Social Security automatically deducts the medicare part B premium from my monthly check. I record the remaining balance as a deposit but is there a way to account for the premium deduction so that when I run a tax report at the end of the year, the deducted amounts show up?
Tagged:
0
Answers
-
Yes. Record the deposit as a split transaction - One split is your gross social security income with a tax line item of Form 1040:Social Security Income, Self or Spouse as appropriate, and the Medicare deductions entered as negative numbers with their own Categories.QWin Premier subscription3
-
Thanks for the reply but I don't seem to be able to do this. Can you walk me through it? (Using, for example, $1,000 for gross soc. sec. income and $100 for the Medicare deduction) What do I enter in the deposit column? Then in the split transaction dialog, what figure do I enter for the social security deposit?0
-
Enter $900 for the net deposit.1,000 is still the gross Social Security
and 100 to medical expense.I'm staying on Quicken 2013 Premier for Windows.
1 -
Here is a test example - along with extra entries for possible IRMAA charges - if your AGI is above certain limits.
A couple of other SS points with Quicken - your SS deposit comes out each month on the same day of the month based upon your last name. You could therefore setup a manual Quicken Reminder to create the deposit entry shown below.
For tax reporting - you need to use a Category with the associated Tax Line Item -
if not already existing - create a new one.1 -
Thanks, everyone!0
-
-
How then do you run a report for net total deposits for the year then? My wife will want to see that.0
-
TTSguy said:How then do you run a report for net total deposits for the year then? My wife will want to see that.0
-
TTSguy said:How then do you run a report for net total deposits for the year then? My wife will want to see that.QWin Premier subscription0
This discussion has been closed.