I have been playing go between with Quicken Support and the support team at One Nevada Credit Union for two months now with no resolution. I even had them on the phone at the same time with both phones on speaker so that they both could hear each other make the accusation that issue was on the other side. Having now had some very good dialog with a support agent from One Nevada, I am convinced it is Quicken's issue. Their authentication API (the message they send to the financial institution) does not include the correct institution ID for One Nevada Credit Union. This is causing the first error (see attached screenshot).
The second error occurs because of the API message Quicken uses to process the two factor authentication is either adding additional digits, or is corrupting the code sent to it from the institution. Quicken claims that they don't generate the code or send it, but the text message received is from Intuit EWC. This would indicate that their API receives the code from the financial institution and relays it back to the user (see the attached screenshot of the text message received). You will notice that the message has eight digits when the financial institution only requires, six digits, and reports they only send six digits via their two-factor authenticator. I believe this because they use the same authentication application for ALL connections, and Quicken seems to be the only third-party vendor that is having this issue. Also you will notice that the message is generated by Intuit EWC — it says so in the message itself. The support staff at One Nevada reported that the number that is sending the message is not the number that sends their two-factor authentication codes.
Has anyone else had any luck with a resolution to this issue? Any pointers? My previous discussion was closed and marked as answered, but it certainly hasn't been answered. I am so frustrated at this point I am looking for other options so that I can get away from Quicken. Since migrating to Quicken, it has been nothing by headache, glitches and trouble and they don't seem to care that their software doesn't work. It is easier to just point the finger in the other direction rather than to do the work to ensure their software delivers on the functionality they promise.
[Edited - Personal Information Removed]