Add support for complex searches (using ==, >, exact match) on accounts filters (35 Legacy Votes)

Quicken Community · November 2016

Add support for complex searches (using ==, >, exact match, etc.) on accounts filters

smayer97 · November 2016

I suspect using syntax like that would appeal to only a very small technically minded population.

That said, the general idea is still valid; to provide a way to search for 'not equal to', 'greater than', 'less than', 'contains', 'exact match', 'starts with', 'ends with', etc. both within an account or across accounts.

It should also include a few more features:

ability to perform AND and OR type searches
ability to select which field(s) to search, that is one or more specified fields

This is mostly available in QM2007. There should be something equivalent in the new Quicken for Mac, etc.

Be sure to click the little grey triangle under the VOTE count in the blue banner below, so your vote will count for THIS feature and increase its visibility to the developers by seeking to have the features you need or desire end up in the latest version (it may take a moment for your vote to register).

(If the triangle is black, your vote has already been counted.)

Your VOTES matter!

smayer97 · November 2016

I also highly recommend that you browse through the IDEAS section of this forum and VOTE for the request of each of the missing features to be added back into Quicken for Mac....to help direct the priorities of the developers.

To do that, I suggest you read this FAQ on how to filter the IDEAS to just show the ones for the Mac version, then VOTE to your heart's content:
https://getsatisfaction.com/quickencommunity/topics/quicken-getsat-faq-how-to-filter-conversations-d...

The following are some of the many feature requests you will find:

and many others.

Be sure to scroll down each page, as some contain lists of related features. Click on the link to EACH IDEA separately that you are interested in, then click the VOTE button at the top of EACH page that opens up respectively to increase the count and therefore its visibility to the developers.

If you do not click VOTE at the top of the page of each feature, your vote will NOT be counted for THAT specific feature!

(If you find this reply helpful, please be sure to click "Like", so others will know, thanks.)

smayer97 · November 2016

You may also want to add your VOTE for other features related to Data Entry and Usability Options and Features.

First, click on the underlined link, then be sure to scroll down the page, as it contains a list of related features. Click on the link to EACH IDEA separately that you are interested in, then click the VOTE button at the top of EACH page that opens up respectively to increase the count and therefore its visibility to the developers.

(If you find this reply helpful, please be sure to click "Like", so others will know, thanks.)

smayer97 · November 2016

I also highly recommend that you browse through the IDEAS section of this forum and VOTE for the request of each of the missing features to be added back into Quicken for Mac....to help direct the priorities of the developers.

To do that, I suggest you read this FAQ on how to filter the IDEAS to just show the ones for the Mac version, then VOTE to your heart's content:
https://getsatisfaction.com/quickencommunity/topics/quicken-getsat-faq-how-to-filter-conversations-d...

The following are some of the many feature requests you will find:

and many others.

Click on each link above, then be sure to scroll down each page, as some contain lists of related features. Then VOTE on EACH IDEA separately that you are interested in.

If you do not click VOTE at the top of the page of each feature, your vote will NOT be counted for THAT specific feature!

(If you find this reply helpful, please be sure to click "Like", so others will know, thanks.)

Crashmeister · February 2017

This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Allow exclusions in search.

Please allow for exclusions in the search such as -xxx.

Example: I use asset accounts to simulate Savings Goals. When viewing the parent account, I sometimes want to exclude all 'goal' transactions from the view, to see a more accurate depiction of what is going on inside the actual account.

By allowing a search criteria, such as -goal (note the minus sign), the search should show all transactions that do not contain 'goal'.

This would be most useful in other situations as well.

Thanks.
Craig.

Robert B · February 2018

smayer97 (QM2007, CDN user since '92) said:
I suspect using syntax like that would appeal to only a very small technically minded population.

That said, the general idea is still valid; to provide a way to search for 'not equal to', 'greater than', 'less than', 'contains', 'exact match', 'starts with', 'ends with', etc. both within an account or across accounts.

It should also include a few more features:
ability to perform AND and OR type searches

ability to select which field(s) to search, that is one or more specified fields

This is mostly available in QM2007. There should be something equivalent in the new Quicken for Mac, etc.

If you find this feature helpful, please be sure to click "VOTE" above to increase the count of this post and therefore its visibility to other users and to the developers.

If you do not click VOTE at the top of the page, your vote will NOT be counted!

Click "Follow" at the top if you want to receive notifications of any updates to this thread.

The creation of a report in QM2007 was very well designed. QM2018 needs to have better report functions, i.e:

gerbouff · February 2020

The ability to search "all transactions" is very useful. Enhancing the searching ability to use "and", "or", "contains", "does not contain", "date range", "amount range" conditions would make it a million times more useful!

jacobs · February 2020

@gerbouff Your new Idea post was merged into this existing Idea thread for advanced search capabilities. Please be sure to vote for it by scrolling up to the top of the thread and finding the blue box under the first post, and then clicking the little gray triangle under the vote counter.

dsnidey · December 2021

It's time to overhaul the filter and search functionality in the register. The pull-downs for Date, Type, Status are handy but too limited. How about a full Filter + Search capability where I can filter on a specific tag, like Groceries, then search within those results using the Search capability. Allow the combination of multiple filters. Also rethink the buttons for Transactions | Spending | Income as these are redundant. I realize Reports can do a lot of this, but I have done extensive projects in Quicken and the best tool is the register, not reports. Reports are fussy and time-consuming.

Quicken Jasmine · December 2021

Hi @dsnidey,

Thank you for reaching out to the Community with your request.

I went ahead and merged your Idea to this active Idea thread regarding this topic.

Ideas are reviewed by our Development and Product teams to see what features people would like to have available in the future. Please, be sure to add your own vote as well by clicking the up arrow (see example below).

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/6031128/uploads/editor/h2/20nycny9c955.png

Thank you,
Quicken Jasmine

garry4 · January 17

>>It's time to overhaul the filter and search functionality in the register.<< --YES THIS--it's so frustrating that a database has such limited search/filter functionality.

Add support for complex searches (using ==, >, exact match) on accounts filters (35 Legacy Votes)

Under Consideration · Last Updated December 2020

Comments

Categories