(Canadian
user since '92, STILL using QM2007)Q Mac vs Q Windows for options trading
Unknown
Member
I converted to QM a little over a year ago after using QW for over 20 years. It worked fine until I started momentum trading options on Fidelity. It isn't unusual for me to have 10 or more options transactions a day. QM does a very poor job with options. I can easily spend 20-30 minutes fixing things.
I'm wondering if anyone that trades options frequently has experience with both QM and QW and can comment on whether going back to QW is something that might help me with this issue.
I'm wondering if anyone that trades options frequently has experience with both QM and QW and can comment on whether going back to QW is something that might help me with this issue.
0
Comments
-
Going back to QW will be very painful since the Mac to Win conversion is very flawed and will require a lot of work to get it straightened out.-splasher using Q since 1996 - Subscription - Win10
-also older versions as needed for testing
-Questions? Check out the Quicken Windows FAQ list0 -
In short, transaction categorization has a tendency to get badly scrambled and investment data does not get imported by QWin (even though they are exported by QMac).splasher said:Going back to QW will be very painful since the Mac to Win conversion is very flawed and will require a lot of work to get it straightened out.
(If you find this reply helpful, please be sure to click "Like", so others will know, thanks.)
Have Questions? Help Guide for Quicken for Mac
FAQs: Quicken Mac • Quicken Windows • Quicken Mobile
Add your VOTE to Quicken for Mac Product Ideas
Object to Quicken's business model, using up 25% of your screen? Add your vote here:Quicken should eliminate the LARGE Ad space when a subscription expires
(Canadian user since '92, STILL using QM2007)0