How to setup Social Security Payments

Roger Everson
Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭

I'm about to start receiving retirement benefits. I've been reading the discussions which all seem to recommend setting these up as a split income reminder. Is there a reason not to set it up as a paycheck? Why or why not? That's what it feels like.

Comments

  • NotACPA
    NotACPA SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    A "paycheck" txn is nothing more than a fancy front end for a split txn. Do what works for you.

    Q user since February, 1990. DOS Version 4
    Now running Quicken Windows Subscription, Business & Personal
    Retired "Certified Information Systems Auditor" & Bank Audit VP

  • Rocket J Squirrel
    Rocket J Squirrel SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    There have been reports of paycheck data becoming corrupted. Do a search in this forum on "paycheck corrupted" to see them.

    It is probably safer to use a plain old split transaction.

    Quicken user since version 2 for DOS, now using QWin Biz & Personal Subscription (US) on Win10 Pro.

  • Roger Everson
    Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭

    Interesting… I've never had a problem with a paycheck in all the years (version 2 for DOS) I've been using this. Other problems, yes, but not that. I think I'll set it up as a paycheck and see what happens. Won't be hard to roll that back a couple of transactions.

  • Rocket J Squirrel
    Rocket J Squirrel SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think I'll set it up as a paycheck and see what happens. Won't be hard to roll that back a couple of transactions.

    The current issue with paycheck corruption sometimes results in years-old paychecks losing data. Then you'll have more than a couple of transactions to repair. I wouldn't risk it. A normal split handles SS just fine.

    Quicken user since version 2 for DOS, now using QWin Biz & Personal Subscription (US) on Win10 Pro.

  • Chris_QPW
    Chris_QPW Member ✭✭✭✭

    Given that in general social security checks splits are quite simple and "custom" to begin with it actually seem like the paycheck wizard is the wrong tool for the job. Now when you have a 401K contribution where Quicken does some hidden splits to hide the employer contributions from the taxes and such, it makes more sense, but not for something as simple as this, which aren't even defaults on the paycheck reminder:

    Signature:
    This is my website: http://www.quicknperlwiz.com/
  • Roger Everson
    Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭

    you probably have a point. There is also the tax withholding.

  • Ps56k2
    Ps56k2 SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2023

    what kind of Retirement Bene….. SSA or some other pension - or even IRA RMD -

    either way, I would set it up as a plain split transaction -
    and make sure that each line item has the appropriate Category either by default,
    or a new one you created to capture the correctly associated Category / Tax Line Item -

    Here is one - like @Chris_QPW above - but with extra lines for the extra added IRMAA charges of SSA -

    Lastly…. for a simple education/teaching pension -
    with nothing other than Fed taxes,
    it is a simple 2 liner Pay Wizard … Gross + Fed

    QWin - R54.16 - Win10

  • Roger Everson
    Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭

    Yes, it's just SSA retirement. Thanks for the feedback and suggestions.

  • Roger Everson
    Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭
    edited April 2023

    Here is an issue I discoverd with using a memorized transaction rather than a paycheck. I get the SS retirement check on the 4th Wednesday of every month. I can set that up with a paycheck, but a split income reminder only gives me the option to choose a specific date. The date of the payment will vary each month. Am I missing an option?

    Here's the paycheck option

    Thanks

    R

  • mshiggins
    mshiggins SuperUser ✭✭✭✭✭

    The trick with the reminder is to choose 1, 2, 3, or 4 as the day. The number chosen then becomes the week number. Try entering 4 as the day instead of 26.

    Quicken user since Q1999. Currently using QW2017.
    Questions? Check out the Quicken Windows FAQ list

  • Roger Everson
    Roger Everson Member ✭✭✭

    thanks

This discussion has been closed.