(Canadian

Is anyone else seeing slowness? We're not seeing it here. Can you try to reboot your Mac to make sure it's Quicken and not something else?AJB211 said:The new version runs very slow. Had this problem maybe 5 updates ago which was correct ted now it is back with V5.11. what's the fix
jsurpless said:Any thoughts on when Reports might gain functionality to show transfers to accounts that excluded from the report as a income/expense?
I think that's pretty much the last thing that's holding me up from switching over completely
I consider transfers on reports separate from budgets but they may be related under-the-hood. I don't know. jsurplass, thanks for the note about Transfers in reports being the last thing you need before completely switching. I also know that many are waiting for better Transfer support on budgets. We've got a bunch of stuff being completed for release in late April early May that we've been working on since November of last year. Once we're past that big hurdle, we can tackle other big software architecture changes.jacobs said:@Quicken Marcus Can you clarify whether allowing transfers to be included in budgets is the same project as allowing transfers to be included in reports, or are these separate development projects? Both are recurring user concerns that show up on this forum recently. Thanks.
Understood. The account sidebar, budgets and the calendar also need improved font control.edmontoncanuck said:I am very pleased to be able to change font size in the register.
And would be doubly pleased if I could set font and size for reports.
We consider these as 2 different features: Move Shares and Transfer Shares. We decided to do Transfer Shares. When discussing these features with a number of customers in another forum post, we felt that Transfer Shares was the better of the 2 because it more closely preserved the reality of having 2 different brokerage accounts. The closed account would maintain the history while the new account contained just the current holdings. Move shares would also require additional work to maintain explicit lot assignments when the transactions were "moved" to the new account.RCinNJ said:Concordman, thanks for bringing this up. I had just assumed that transferring "everything" meant everything. Makes me wonder if it is possible to just rename the existing account and point future downloads to the new Brokerage House? My investments' history is important to me, what Brokerage House the investments are at (and when they were transferred) is relatively trivial.Concordman said:@Qucken Marcus, with regards to the investments update which I note is a move in the right direction ; are there any plans to move the history from the originating account to the destination account similar to what can be done in the cash & Credit card accounts.
Is renaming and repointing the account possible? If it is possible, are there unintended consequences that would make losing the history preferable?
There was never an Add Income button but there probably should be one. You don't really need one, though. You can just create a scheduled transaction in your checking account and if it's an income transaction, it will appear under the Income tab.sac1281 said:What happen to add income function under bills and income? No tab to add
Please do look to see if you have a filter set. We get calls all the time in Care about Quicken losing people's data only to find out they have a filter set. If you see a button with a red x and the text Clear Filters, then you have a filter set. This is very common.Concordman said:@tscan, sounds strange that you lost history, might want to check the account register to determine if you have any filters active.tscan said:After I downloaded the update 5.11 for Mac and checked may accounts, a whole year of entries had disappeared! How can I restore them? Looks like the update wiped out my latest backups too! Some update!
Hello Marcus - the new Transfer Shares action is an excellent improvement, and I agree with your choice of implementing Transfer Shares vs. Move Shares due to the reason you cite above - the reality of having different brokerage accounts that live on independently. However, while I hate to be a broken record about this, the resulting Remove Shares action still has a defect - it treats share removal as a 100% loss from a performance measure perspective (IRR, ROI). This incorrectly affects the IRR and ROI of any remaining shares of the same security in the account, the IRR and ROI of the share type and asset class in the account, and the overall IRR and ROI for the account. In other words, it makes the IRR and ROI measurements useless for that account. I have brought this up multiple times in the past, but have given up mentioning it due lack of response. However, since you are working in this area again, I thought I would ask if you intend to look at this issue and fix it. Thanks.We consider these as 2 different features: Move Shares and Transfer Shares. We decided to do Transfer Shares. When discussing these features with a number of customers in another forum post, we felt that Transfer Shares was the better of the 2 because it more closely preserved the reality of having 2 different brokerage accounts. The closed account would maintain the history while the new account contained just the current holdings. Move shares would also require additional work to maintain explicit lot assignments when the transactions were "moved" to the new account.
@2coolbaby Yes, you're on the right track. This happens from time to time with users; there's something that's getting stuck trying to install within your current application file, but it's easy to get around. by getting rid of your current Quicken application and downloading a fresh copy from Quicken.com.2coolbaby said:I cannot update to 5.11.0 In fact, my last successful update was 5.6! When running my Quicken, it downloads and tries to Install in my Applications, but I think because Quicken in running, it won't install it. I get this error: An error occurred while relaunching Quicken, but the new version will be available next time you run Quicken. Well, it isn't. I've been getting this error for months when I try to install and restarting and reopening the app just brings up the install update circle. Unfortunately, I can't find where it downloads it to my mac. I've checked Downloads, Desktop and not there, so I can't close the app and just install in the Applications folder and overwrite the old one. I'm at a loss here. I have downloaded a backup and the only thing I can think to do is to delete the current one. Then download a copy from My Account and then install fresh and import the backup.
David, I found your "report a problem" screenshot. From the picture, I can't really tell what the issue is or possibly this is a picture of how it should work. Can you provide more detail about what isn't working so we can try to fix it? We tested using official Quickbook Canadian checks. Are you changing the check style to Canada in the print check dialog?David Parisi said:Version 5.10 was supposed to allow Canadian cheques to print correctly. It didn't work and still doesn't work with the latest release. I sent a voided Canadian cheque to Quicken using the "report a problem" tab in "help". Perhaps that might help.
Thanks!
dp
I'm not aware of any changes in 5.11 that would have changed this behavior and I actually don't think we do anything with permissions. I think this is all handled by the OS? Can you describe in more detail what you're doing? Do you have the file on a file share accessed by different computers or are you using the same computer with a shared folder? In general, it would be great to get a detailed explanation of your setup so we can try to reproduce the issue here.dhuck said:Version 5.11.0 appears to be modifying file permissions when exiting, preventing multiple users from sharing the same data file. This used to work fine on previous versions (at least since December 2018) after setting the appropriate permissions to allow both users R/W access to the data file, but now starting with 5.11.0 I need to manually reset permissions on the data file every time after quitting in order to allow the other user to access the file. Reverting to v 5.10.1 resolves this issue, so this appears to be a regression introduced in 5.11.0.
Can this be fixed?As far as I know we haven't changed anything like that.
Hello Marcus - the new Transfer Shares action is an excellent improvement, and I agree with your choice of implementing Transfer Shares vs. Move Shares due to the reason you cite above - the reality of having different brokerage accounts that live on independently. However, while I hate to be a broken record about this, the resulting Remove Shares action still has a defect - it treats share removal as a 100% loss from a performance measure perspective (IRR, ROI). This incorrectly affects the IRR and ROI of any remaining shares of the same security in the account, the IRR and ROI of the share type and asset class in the account, and the overall IRR and ROI for the account. In other words, it makes the IRR and ROI measurements useless for that account. I have brought this up multiple times in the past, but have given up mentioning it due lack of response. However, since you are working in this area again, I thought I would ask if you intend to look at this issue and fix it. Thanks.
S2kdriver –
Thanks for your post. It helped us to identify a NEW problem that is actually different from what you thought it was. The good news is that the underlying problem that you have been reporting for a while actually has been fixed. Starting in Release 5.9, Add Shares and Remove Shares transactions are included in the performance calculations at “market value” (based on the price history) as of the date the shares are added to or removed from the register. (Acquisition Date of an Add Shares is not considered for this purpose, nor is the cost basis information that you enter on the form.)
What we did uncover because of your post is that the Remove Shares transaction that is automatically created by the Transfer Shares operation has the wrong sign for the number of shares. This does not affect the overall holdings and reporting, but it does impact the Performance calculations and is what is causing the problem that you are now seeing. This will be fixed, and the transactions automatically corrected, in the next release. In the meantime, there is a simple workaround. Edit the Remove Shares transaction that was created by the Transfer Shares operation. Temporarily change the number of shares and save the transaction. Then go back and edit it again and restore the correct number of shares. After you save it the second time, the error will be corrected and the IRR and ROI calculations will be accurate.
Note that the Add Shares transactions in the “Transfer to Account” do not have the same problem and you do not have to do anything to them. Also, any manually-created Remove Shares transactions should be yielding accurate performance results.
Please try this out and let us know if it is working for you.
dgsimm said:I recently purchased Quicken for Mac Deluxe 2019. The conversion of my Quicken Mac 2007 files went smoothly. However, my accounts had a mixture of taxable and non-taxable (IRA) securities. The conversion process did not preserve the categories of non-taxable income for dividends, interest, long/short capital gains in the transaction registers. Instead there appears to be only one category for those types of income. Was this intentional and if so why? Also, on the securities detail screen, checking the box Tax Free seems to have no impact that I can see. Please explain.
@jacobs – Thanks for jumping in here, but I think the question is not about retirement accounts, but really about tax-free bonds (like municipal bonds) or tax-free bond or money market funds within a taxable account. The dividend or interest income from these securities is not subject to taxes, although, unlike retirement accounts, the income does need to be reported on your income tax forms.
@dgsimm – Thanks for reporting this. This is a request for improvement that has been made a few times before. For example, see
https://community.quicken.com/discussion/7341499/tax-exempt-dividends-for-muni-bonds-in-quicken-mac
This is currently a very high priority on our list of improvements.
Hi Eli,Quicken Eli said:S2kdriver –
Thanks for your post. It helped us to identify a NEW problem that is actually different from what you thought it was. The good news is that the underlying problem that you have been reporting for a while actually has been fixed. Starting in Release 5.9, Add Shares and Remove Shares transactions are included in the performance calculations at “market value” (based on the price history) as of the date the shares are added to or removed from the register. (Acquisition Date of an Add Shares is not considered for this purpose, nor is the cost basis information that you enter on the form.)
What we did uncover because of your post is that the Remove Shares transaction that is automatically created by the Transfer Shares operation has the wrong sign for the number of shares. This does not affect the overall holdings and reporting, but it does impact the Performance calculations and is what is causing the problem that you are now seeing. This will be fixed, and the transactions automatically corrected, in the next release. In the meantime, there is a simple workaround. Edit the Remove Shares transaction that was created by the Transfer Shares operation. Temporarily change the number of shares and save the transaction. Then go back and edit it again and restore the correct number of shares. After you save it the second time, the error will be corrected and the IRR and ROI calculations will be accurate.
Note that the Add Shares transactions in the “Transfer to Account” do not have the same problem and you do not have to do anything to them. Also, any manually-created Remove Shares transactions should be yielding accurate performance results.
Please try this out and let us know if it is working for you.
Yes - the next release will eliminate the problem with using Transfer Shares and will fix up any existing transactions that were created by Transfer Shares. Since my last post, I discovered that not ALL Transfer Shares were affected. Specifically, if you used the “One Security” radio button, everything should be OK. It is only when using the “All Securities” radio button that the Remove Shares was created incorrectly.
As far as your having problems with Remove Shares that were created before 5.9, I am not aware of any problems. Once we fixed the performance calculation logic in 5.9 to handle Add/Remove shares, all the existing cases that we tried worked correctly – there was no need to apply any “fixup” to existing transactions.
That is a good catch on the “Gain/Loss” column for Remove Shares (it also applies to Transfer Shares). I can imagine times when the number might be useful, for example, if you are selecting shares to make a charitable contribution, but the label is not accurate. I created an internal report to track the improvement.