I know that Quicken removed support for using tags in budgets in QWin because of some challenges, and so this is also not available in QMac.
BUT I believe there is a solution to addressing this that may help this feature be viable.
I presented the same solution (over 2 years ago
here) in the context of designing a
Columnar Report like in QM2007 that is still lacking in "modern" subscription QMac, with one of the options being creating a report based on categories vs tags.
So please add this feature back for budgets (as well as for Columnar Reports, when it is implemented).Adding your
VOTE for this feature is not voting for the solution but the feature only. If you like (or dislike) the proposed solution, add your comments below.
If you find this feature helpful, please be sure to
click "VOTE" above to increase the count of this post and therefore its visibility to other users and to the developers by seeking to have the features you need or desire end up in the latest version.
If you do not click VOTE at the top of the page, your vote will NOT be counted! Your VOTE matters!Also click "Follow" at the top if you want to receive notifications of any updates to this thread.
This IDEA has been added to the
List of Requests Related to Budgets. You may want to
click on the underlined link,
then follow the instructions to add your vote to other related IDEAS.
--------------------
Proposed possible solution (refined from original recommendation):
Since transactions can have multiple tags, there is the possibility to get cross-tagging, which would result in double-counting. I believe the options are quite simple to deal with this. Let me present to you my suggestions:
Without having analyzed it completely, I can see only a few solutions to that challenge of designing and developing such a feature:
- either the budget carries a warning that any transactions that have more than one tag and appear on the budget will be double counted, (not terribly useful but better than nothing)
- or the program goes the extra step to warn the user if it found cross-tagged transactions that are being double-counted but nothing else (again, not great but better than nothing)
- or even one step further, for any row where cross-tags are detected, those fields are highlighted (coloured, formatted, etc) to show where the double-counting is taking place; this would give the user a visual cue as to where approximately the cross-tagging exists.
- or one step further, the user can be given the option to not display subtotal or total for those lines or columns; again enhancing the visual cue.
Whichever way, I cannot see any program knowing what to do beyond that; it would be up to the user to decide how best to handle that. In some cases, it may be as simple as the user choosing to not display subtotals and/or totals (QM2007 has the functionality to choose your columns, including which subtotals and totals to display in
reports; the same could apply to budgets), or the user would have to decide if that cross-tagging makes sense for the transactions involved and clean it up.