(Canadian

UKR said:What we really need is a change to how Signature lines are formatted.
A smaller font size and maybe a different font type should be used.The lines should be as compact together as possible, with little blank space between lines.And, yes, there should be a limit on the total number of lines."Keep it short and sweet."
As we know from Sarah, Quicken doesn't have control over the style of the site. (Why else would hyperlinks still be not underlined without a user doing it themselves.) Changing the font, size, spacing, or maximum lines would require a change by Vanilla, and we know how quickly and smoothly those go.UKR said:What we really need is a change to how Signature lines are formatted.
A smaller font size and maybe a different font type should be used.
Yes, they have mangled it many times.... tired of trying to keep up. Not important enough to keep coming up with work-arounds.Sherlock said:
Since the forum last mangled the signatures, ...
@smaeyer97 Yes, we can cite and agree on many shortcoming about Vanilla. In this case, though, the issue is easily controllable by users. The question to you is simply whether you would shorten your signature -- currently 9 lines tall -- for the benefit of other users, and especially your fellow SUs who spend a lot of time on the forum.smayer97 said:Yes, they have mangled it many times.... tired of trying to keep up. Not important enough to keep coming up with work-arounds.Sherlock said:
Since the forum last mangled the signatures, ...Clearly Vanilla does not care and has poor quality control.
Well, I'd say two things about that. (1) That's a flaw in Vanilla's forum design. If signatures are deemed to convey useful information, then they shouldn't be omitted when viewing on a phone. (2) While I do sometime check messages on a phone, I certainly don't do most of my forum activity on a phone; 98% of my time on the forum is on a computer. And the long signatures are annoying to wade through in the thread, especially when the same one appears multiple times in a thread. The fact that they are not visible on a phone is irrelevant for me, and I suspect most of us.thecreator said:When you read the messages on Your Smart Phone, the forum messages, contains no Signatures. Only when reading the messages in your computer's browser do you see the signatures.
you are waxing wide... I was not.jacobs said:@smaeyer97 Yes, we can cite and agree on many shortcoming about Vanilla. ...smayer97 said:Yes, they have mangled it many times.... tired of trying to keep up. Not important enough to keep coming up with work-arounds.Sherlock said:
Since the forum last mangled the signatures, ...Clearly Vanilla does not care and has poor quality control.
NotACPA said:I've discovered that I can condense the number of lines in my signature by using CTRL-Enter, instead of just enter, at the end of each line.
Sorry, I don't know what that means.