nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Envelope Budgeting (Q Mac)- (9 merged vote)

Quicken Community

While I enjoy using Quicken, it seems to be lacking one very functional feature, envelope budgeting. For example if I budget $50 a month for clothing but don't use it, I would apply that amount to a category I have over spent on. I have seen this feature in other software for while you may over spend in one area, you may still underspend overall for that month. I have seen links here where people try to work around it. They are usually more complicated than they are worth. This should really be an integral feature to Quicken's budget section. I do realize it gives you your Net over/under and I find envelope budgeting much more helpful. Hopefully you can add this to a future update.

Find more posts tagged with

Planned

Budgets

Mac

Status: Planned

Comments

mshiggins

For starters, are you using QMac or QWin?

unknown

Mac

Tom Young

I've suggested a process that may amount to the same thing, really, as moving budgeted amounts between Categories, over here:

https://getsatisfaction.com/quickencommunity/topics/balancing-my-budget-monthly

It seems like "envelope" budgeting consists of:

1) Setting a budget for a period, by Category, which Quicken can certainly do.

2) Determining that come hell or high water you're only going to spend the total budgeted amount, irrespective of how the "actuals" distribute themselves across Categories.

You can do that in Quicken by simply depositing that amount in a checking account and when the money runs out, you stop spending.

3) Moving cash between envelopes when you run out of cash in one Category but need more.

And that's where envelope budgeting fails, in my opinion. Unless you're going to do the extra work of writing notes to yourself every time you move cash between envelopes and updating totals, at the end of the month you're left with a bunch of empty envelopes with no idea where your money went. But by using Quicken and NOT constantly changing "budget" amounts, at the end of the period you know

How much you actually spent for the period on each Category and
How close you came to spending the budgeted amount for each Category

It's the misses between "actual" and "budget" that inform you where you need to sharpen your estimates and/or take a closer look at your spending.

I've never done envelope budgeting so maybe my knowledge of what it entails is too superficial, but it does seem to me that constantly changing "budget" amounts is a lot of extra work that, essentially, ends up destroying valuable information.

unknown

I think what some of you are missing is psychology not "numbers".

Personally have never used a budget in my life.
I'm a saver by nature, and I'm always very aware of every thing I spend and making a decision on it at the time I spend it (not later when I'm getting close to a "limit"), and I have always lived below my means.

In other words I'm self limiting, instead of needing an external limiting system.
Now I have created budgets, I just don't live by them, and to me the budgets that I create are mostly to see what that I understand what my yearly income/expense flow is. Mainly just to make sure I'm on track for the future (won't running out of money before I die).

Anyways if you look at a subject that is close to budgeting find "debit". And you find a strange concept of "snowball". Any "numbers" person will tell you that you should pay off the debit with the highest interest rate first. "Snowball" says pay off the smallest debt first, why?
Well it seems that if you attack a big debt with a high interest rate, it doesn't seem to go down very much at all. If you pay off the small one you get the satisfaction that it seems to go down faster, because it is being compared to itself not the overall debt.

Then there is the subject of Savings Goals. Another thing I have never used.
This a "hide my money, sort of" system.

For people that see money, spend money, this trick seems to work for them.
For my brain it doesn't make any sense at all. I don't spend money just because I have it.

The point is that the way I see it this has nothing to do with "numbers" it has to do with figuring out the psychology that a person needs to trick themselves into limiting their spending.

If that is "envelops", then that is what is needed. It doesn't have to "make sense" to someone one else that has another way to limit their spending to what they can afford.

unknown

In a perfect world of course it would be easier to stick with established budgets as you describe; however, as you well know (or will learn eventually) we do not live in a perfect world. Flexibility, adaptability, and collaboration is what works. I'm not talking about a single person managing his or her own budget, I'm talking about a person (me) being responsible for the budget of the entire family. We all try but, you know, stuff happens unexpectedly and from all angles sometimes. Envelope accounting allows me to keep the peace by not going bananas whenever something comes up to screw up the budget. If someone spends too much from time to time on any given category and I can cover it from another category that happens to be well funded at that time, then we solve the crisis. You still get enough information to keep the overall budget intact, just sometimes the inner details don't go quite as planned. Very workable because it allows for some wiggle room before having to put the hammer down on the budget scofflaws (wife, kids, inflation, accidents, taxes....) that don't always share the same appreciation of a balanced budget that I do.

unknown

What difference does it make if you're shifting funds from one envelope to another...or you know what you have to spend for the month and what your non-discretionary expenses are?

Somewhere along the line you know what you'll have left for discretionary spending.

And setting up Bill reminders and having them posted into the Quicken Windows register xxx numbers of days ahead of being paid/posted allows me to know what is left and how I'm doing for the month.

On my Home Page that opens with Quicken, I have my bill reminders for the next 14 days, my See Where Your Money Goes graph which tells me my monthly spending so far, and the In/Out/What's Left Cash Flow which tells me EXACTLY whether I am under or over my income for the month and which INCLUDES those bills in the Bill Reminder.

unknown

Randy Brown

Personally I think people make too much of a big deal "negative numbers", and really miss the point of a budget.

For instance in Quicken 2012 it looked like it wasn't possible to change the budget numbers for the past months (not true, but it looked that way).

People freaked out, and demanded that they be able to change them.

That and your statement tends to tell me that we look at budgets completely differently.

To me a budget has two main purposes. One is it is a prediction. Two it should allow for understanding if the whole budget is failing or just one or more categories.

No one is perfect in a prediction. It should be assumed that you will either have a surplus or a lack of funds in some category(s).

You predict, you measure, you try to do better next time.

Anyone that wants to change past months budget amounts are basically saying that they will not accept the fact that predictions are not 100%.

They want to go back and change the budget numbers for the past so that they look like they predicted correctly when they in fact didn't.

It is like taking a test and when you get some of the answers wrong, you go back and change your answers so that your score is better. It makes you look good, but teaches you nothing about how to be better on predicting your budget.

On the second part to see if the problem is just one category where you can move the money around, well that is what the totals are for.

For instance you can have a category group that is labeled "Flexible".
In you put all the categories that you are willing to move money around in.
As long as the category group balance doesn't go negative you are OK.

It is perfectly fine to have some categories that are negative and some that are positive. And for the months after it you can consider changing the budget amounts if you are finding that one (or more) categories are really different than what you predicted.

JoeBlow

I used [removed] for over a year and liked it. I couldn't drop Quicken because it had so many other things, like investment tracking and tax planning.

I used to sneer at envelope budgeting as simplistic but I actually changed my spending habits when using it. Ultimately I missed the ability to forecast cash flow and got tired of double entry in Quicken.

I just dropped [removed] and am trying to use some of its approaches in Quicken. One thing I miss is the ability to easily shift budget allocations from one category to another. Yes, I can reduce the amount allocated to one category and it to another category or split it among multiple categories.

But I really miss the simple 'move' function [removed] has. Just right-click, type in the amount of an excess to move, and pick the category to move it to, from a drop-down list. (Right-click is for Windows. I assume a similar action works on a Mac.) If the the category balance is negative, default it to shift that amount from the budgeted amount of another category that has a positive balance.

That would improve the budget a lot. As Quicken's budget hasn't changed in years, as far as I know, enhancements are sorely needed.

pauldv172

I do the same thing so I did vote for it.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Concordman

Got my vote

Snowman

I would vote for this as well.

smayer97

I would vote for this as well.

Then be sure to click VOTE above... ;-)

Chris Harris

I agree and voted accordingly. This would be a very beneficial addition for both Mac and Windows. I too am doing double entry with [removed] right now and still constantly go back and forth on whether to officially make the switch. I just can't get past the fact that Quicken has so much more functionality than [removed]. Also, now that Quicken is no longer owned by Intuit, I've actually seen positive movement after years and years and years of decline. I really do hope Quicken spends the time to overhaul the Budgeting module. It needs work and [removed] would be a great source of ideas for Quicken's developers

Budgeting is a critical function for any financial app/software and [removed] certainly has Quicken beat in that regard; though I'm rooting for Quicken! JoeBlow said it best. Getting us to change our spending habits should be the end goal.

JoeBlow said:

I used to sneer at envelope budgeting as simplistic but I actually changed my spending habits when using it.

Austin@

This is one of the features I would like to see added the most. It seems like a no brainer, and I’m honestly surprised this functionality doesn’t already exist. You have my vote!

Karen Trusssell

I would l love this feature

Joia

I'm new here. How do I vote? I too have used envelopes and would love to see this added to Quicken.

Chris Harris

Hi Joia, welcome to the community!

Just click the up arrow in the blue box underneath the first/original post. Please do make sure to vote for ideas you like so Quicken gets a sense for what they should work on next.

hatTia

> @szwakyd said:
> While I enjoy using Quicken, it seems to be lacking one very functional feature, envelope budgeting.

This is similar to Savings Goals, or Rollover Budgeting, which is offered in Quicken Windows.

There is a thread that is trying to get up votes for Savings Goals Here: https://community.quicken.com/discussion/7333033/qmac-savings-goals-110-legacy-votes/p1

Hopefully, if we can find a post with the most votes, and keep adding to it, it will get Quicken to prioritize this feature. It is a common way of budgeting, similar concept when using "zero-based budgeting" and many folks use it such as YNAB.

I have used it and love it, but I also like what Quicken has to offer. I have not quite decided which way to in terms of paying for a subscription. Most likely, I'll pay more for the rollover budgeting, saving goal, envelope type budget as I value it.

Maybe one day Quicken will to for Mac users. The only way to let them know is to try and get more people to vote. Unfortunately, I find this community board not user friendly in terms of locating posts. You can't filter search to specific groups like only Mac related posts.

rwxx

I would switch to Quicken if it had envelope budgeting. I currently use another Mac-only finance app simply because it offers envelope budgeting. I don't love that app, but it offers this key budgeting feature.

Quicken_Tyka

Hello all,

The Community Support team regularly reviews long-standing posts and Ideas for relevancy and current interest. This Idea seems to have stalled and we would like to gauge the current interest in this request.

If you would like to see this idea implemented, please add your vote and a comment explaining how this idea would be beneficial for you. More information, including steps to vote and how to submit your own Ideas for future product features/improvements, is also available here.

Thank you,

Quicken Community Support Team

Estrellasola

I would not vote for envelope budgeting. A budget is a prediction for a certain period. In order to ESTIMATE the budget for the next period one needs to look at the prior period budget, note the categories that are over or under and understand the differences . There should always be a "give" in a budget. It does not have to be exact.

NotACPA

How do I vote AGAINST implementing the ATROCITY of "envelope budgeting" in Q.

If you want envelopes, then go buy envelopes, and to the math in a spreadsheet.

MavWitt

Things not understood are often vilified. Being from the spend-only-what-you-have camp I vote for envelope budgeting in Quicken.

mdavid

I would like to see this feature added.

pactaz

I think adding this functionality is where quicken goes from just a checkbook and Investment tracking program to a personalized Money Management tool. This could easily be a sub program tied to the base program. If you want to use it you could - if not, don't. This in my opinion would set Quicken apart as it could do it all.

AVH

Just adding a vote for this very feature. This is a pretty common way people like to think about their savings, while having just one savings account.

quidster

Any news on this feature? One way this could be implemented would be to leverage tags. Being able to add virtual accounts based on some filter criteria (EG has "tag1", does not have "tag2") would be so great.

Mac User

Way overdue. Simplify and Moneydance both do this much better than Quicken.

majorgear

You have my vote as well!

Quicken Kristina

Hello All,

The status of this Idea has been changed to Under Consideration as it has reached enough votes and has been submitted to our Product and Development team for further review.

Thank you!